CCS Capacity Grows 10% But 2035 Targets Remain DistantPhoto via Unsplash
behydrogen.ai

CCS Capacity Grows 10% But 2035 Targets Remain Distant

carbon captureCCSRED IIIReFuelEUCO2 utilisation
August 22, 2026  •  4 min read
Carbon capture and storage is growing — but not fast enough. The IEA’s August 2026 project update confirmed that global operational and under-construction capture capacity rose more than 10% year-on-year, and storage capacity expanded by roughly 25%, yet the agency found that a significant share of projects remain delayed toward 2035. For compliance directors mapping decarbonisation roadmaps under RED III, ReFuelEU and the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism, those delays are not an abstraction: they translate directly into stranded-asset risk and unmet regulatory obligations.
>10%
Rise in global operational & under-construction CO₂ capture capacity (IEA 2026)
~25%
Growth in global CO₂ storage capacity (IEA 2026)
2035
Horizon by which many delayed CCS projects are now expected to reach completion
31 Dec 2024
ReFuelEU Aviation penalty-regime deadline missed by 13 EU Member States

What the IEA Numbers Actually Mean for EU Compliance Officers

A greater-than-10% rise in capture capacity sounds encouraging until you map it against the volumes that RED III, the EU Emissions Trading System and ReFuelEU Aviation implicitly assume will be sequestered or utilised by the early 2030s. The IEA’s finding that many projects remain delayed toward 2035 is the operative phrase: for an industrial site whose compliance calendar runs to 2030 or 2032, a project that slips to 2035 is, functionally, unavailable. Marketing directors selling green credentials to B2B customers need to be equally alert — claims anchored to CCS offtake agreements that are themselves contingent on delayed infrastructure carry reputational and legal exposure under the EU’s Green Claims Directive.

The regulatory pressure is already visible. The European Commission launched infringement proceedings in June 2026 against 13 Member States for failing to communicate their ReFuelEU Aviation penalty regimes by the 31 December 2024 deadline. The message is unambiguous: the Commission is prepared to enforce, and operators who have built business cases on the assumption that member-state implementation would lag indefinitely are now recalibrating.

CO₂ Utilisation as the Near-Term Bridge — and the BE.Hydrogen Angle

Where geological storage pipelines are delayed, CO₂ utilisation — converting captured carbon into e-fuels, e-methanol or synthetic feedstocks — offers a compliance bridge that does not depend on sequestration infrastructure being in service by 2030. This is precisely the logic that makes Belgium’s BE.Hydrogen programme, launched in March 2026, strategically relevant beyond its primary geological-survey mandate. The programme, led under Minister Crucke with support from Belspo and the Geological Survey of Belgium, is mapping subsurface conditions in the Belgian coal basins and the Hercynian basement across the Greater Region. No natural hydrogen accumulation or commercially exploitable resource has been confirmed on Belgian territory — BE.Hydrogen remains a survey, not a discovery. But the subsurface data it generates will also inform assessments of potential CO₂ storage formations, feeding directly into the industrial CO₂ utilisation and storage planning that Belgian and cross-border operators need for RED III compliance.

If geological natural hydrogen were ultimately confirmed in the region — still an open scientific question — it would carry a further implication for the CCS efficiency debate: natural hydrogen requires no renewable electricity to produce, which sidesteps the well-to-wheel energy-loss argument that critics level at electrolysis-based e-fuels. That argument — that e-fuel powertrains consume roughly five times more electricity per kilometre than a battery-electric vehicle — remains the strongest objection to synthetic fuels in road transport, and it is an honest one. CO₂ utilisation for aviation and shipping, where batteries cannot substitute, faces a far weaker version of that critique.

2030–2032 Compliance Calendar: Three Actions Now

For compliance and marketing directors, the IEA data and the Commission’s enforcement posture suggest three immediate priorities. First, audit any CCS-dependent decarbonisation commitments against realistic project timelines — if your offtake or abatement plan relies on infrastructure flagged as delayed toward 2035, you need a contingency. Second, map your ReFuelEU and RED III exposure: the infringement proceedings against 13 Member States signal that penalty regimes will eventually land, and operators who have not stress-tested their fuel-procurement chains against blending mandates are behind the curve. Third, monitor subsurface survey programmes such as BE.Hydrogen for storage-formation data that could accelerate national and cross-border CCS permitting in the 2028–2032 window — geological surveys have long lead times, and the data being gathered now will determine what is physically possible at mid-decade.

Bottom Line
The IEA’s 2026 numbers confirm that carbon capture is scaling, but the gap between current trajectory and 2030–2032 compliance requirements remains material. With the European Commission already enforcing ReFuelEU deadlines through infringement proceedings, EU operators cannot afford to treat delayed CCS infrastructure as a planning assumption. CO₂ utilisation — converting captured carbon into regulated synthetic fuels — offers the most actionable near-term bridge, and geological programmes like Belgium’s BE.Hydrogen survey may ultimately expand the storage and subsurface-data picture across the Greater Region, even if no exploitable resource has yet been confirmed.

Sources

Featured image via Unsplash.

⚙️ AI Transparency · EU Regulation 2024/1689 (AI Act) · art. 50
This article was produced with the assistance of an artificial intelligence system (Claude, Anthropic). This notice applies to all editorial content on this site, including automatically published content. Informational only — verify official sources before any decision.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *